Is Texas Governor Abbott a Mean Fuck? | Robert J. Fickman

Blog Home

Dec
26
2015

Is Texas Governor Abbott a Mean Fuck?

Posted by: Robert Fickman

Category: The Meaning of America by Robb Fickman

Friends

Abbott mean? When he was 29 an oak tree fell on him. He sued the owner of the tree and others and settled for $10,000,000. When he ran for governor, he attacked his opponent as a PI lawyer. His own fucking PI lawyer called Abbott a hypocrite. It was ok for him to get paid for his injury, but he doesn’t want anyone else to get paid for theirs. He’s not a mean fuck, he’s THE mean fuck. Don’t be fooled by the wheelchair, he has even opposed enforcement of the Americans for Disabilities Act. He’s fighting hard against Texans and so far the piece of shit is winning.
Robb FIckman, Houston

Related

Blog Home

<< "... And here is your badge, uniform, gun and no bill..."

HARRIS COUNTY, WHERE PR BONDS ARE DENIED AND THE POOR ARE CRUSHED SO THAT THE JUDGES MIGHT HAVE TIDY DOCKETS >>

What Our Clients Are Saying About Us

2025-08-18

I will highly recommend Robert fickman as an attorney... he just got my supervise release terminated! Great job Mr Fickman I really appreciate you and youre...

Black R.

View full review here

2025-03-25

I never had to deal with anything legal in my life. I knew to seek a lawyer, but I was afraid of whom ever I talked to might not take my case (accused of...

Peter

View full review here

2025-01-03

Robert is one of the most thorough and competent attorneys I have ever worked with.

James G.

View full review here

2024-09-20

Mr. Fickman helped me get my supervised release terminated earlier than most other attorneys I spoke to said would be possible.

Jay

View full review here

VIEW ALL TESTIMONIALS

Case Results

AGGRAVATED ROBBERY WITH A DEADLY WEAPON

Case Dismissed (J.S.)

The client was wrongfully charged with Aggravated Robbery with a Deadly Weapon. The complainant alleged that the Defendant arrived at the complainant’s home to meet to discuss a business deal. The complainant alleged that the Defendant suddenly drew a firearm and robbed the complainant. The Defense interviewed the complainant. The complainant’s story was full of holes, and it kept changing. In the end, the complainant’s story made no sense. An argument was presented to the prosecutor explaining all of the holes in the complainant’s story.

Related

EARLY TERMINATION OF FEDERAL SUPERVISED RELEASE

The Motion for Early Termination of Supervised Release was Granted and the supervised release was terminated. (J.R.)

The client was serving a lengthy Federal supervised release for a drug-related offense. An investigation was conducted, and the Defense filed a Motion for Early Termination of Supervised Release.

Related

SEXUAL ASSAULT

No Charges were Filed

The client taught private music lessons. One of the Client’s students alleged that he sexually assaulted the student during a lesson. The Defense Investigation found substantial evidence negating the veracity of the allegation. The complainant’s own conduct was contrary to the allegation. A Defense Package was prepared and presented to law enforcement, and the matter was dropped.

Related

PPP FRAUD-ENGAGING IN ORGANIZED CRIMINAL ACTIVITY

Case Dismissed (V.O.)

The defendant was accused of conspiring with others to commit PPP fraud. The Defense demonstrated that the Defendant was not involved in any conspiracy. Defendant was talked into applying for a PPP loan by a third party. The third party was to receive a percentage of the loan if it was granted. Defendant had no familiarity with the law governing PPP loans. The Defendant relied on the third party to accurately complete the PPP loan application. The third party completed the loan application with fraudulent information. The Defendant was conned and received PPP funds without knowing that the third party had committed PPP fraud. The Defense negotiated an agreement under which the Defendant would make full restitution of the fraudulently obtained loan and serve a short pretrial diversion.

Related

FELONY INJURY TO A CHILD

Grand Jury No Billed and the Charges against the Defendant were Dismissed. (C.H.)

Defendant had agreed to step in and help raise a teenage family member. The teenager moved in with the client’s family, and they did everything they could to help the teen feel at home. The teenager did not want to live with the Client or his family. The teenager made false claims that the Client had physically abused him. Charges were accepted with little police investigation. The Defense launched a “no stone unturned ” investigation. Substantial evidence was developed demonstrating that the teen had planned the false allegation. The allegations made were not supported by the physical evidence. All other family members gave statements in support of the defense. A chronological history and photographs supported the defense. The client took and passed a secret polygraph examination.

All the evidence gathered was put in a Defense package, which was presented to the Prosecutor and the Grand Jury. The Grand Jury returned a NO-Bill, and the charges of Felony Injury to Child were dismissed.

Related

ASSAULT -FAMILY MEMBER

Case Dismissed (S.M.)

The client was falsely accused by her abusive husband of assaulting him. The defense showed that the husband had a history of alcohol abuse and violence. The defense showed that the husband had discharged a firearm in the house and kicked in a door when the client had retreated to a bathroom. The defense put together a comprehensive package, including prior photographs and video showing the complainant’s violent and threatening past. The defense demonstrated that the investigating police officer had done an inadequate investigation. He accepted the husband’s word and filed charges against the defendant’s wife without even attempting to talk to the defendant. A lengthy Defense package was prepared for the DA. After a meeting with the prosecutor, the charges were dismissed.

Related

FEDERAL MARRIAGE FRAUD

No Charges Filed (M.E.)

The client was accused of marriage fraud as a means of obtaining citizenship. The Client and his family were hounded by a federal agent. After a thorough defense investigation showed the marriage was legitimate, the matter was dropped, and no charges were filed against the Client

Related

AGGRAVATED ASSAULT WITH A DEADLY WEAPON

Grand Jury No Bill- No Charges (Expunction granted)

It was in the early morning hours, while it was still dark outside. A stranger was near the front door, seen rummaging around. The homeowner was alone with her children. She was concerned that the stranger was looking for a key and would try to break into her home. The homeowner called the police and waited. The stranger did not leave. The homeowner, in fear for her family, called the client, who was a family member. The client immediately drove to the homeowner’s house. The client parked his vehicle and observed the stranger still rummaging about near the front door. The client told the stranger to leave the property. When the stranger made aggressive moves toward the client and the homeowner, the client acted in self-defense and to defend the homeowner. After a lengthy investigation, a detailed package was prepared for the grand jury. The package covered self-defense and homeowner defense.

Related

EARLY TERMINATION OF A FEDERAL LIFETIME SUPERVISED RELEASE

Motion Granted and Client released from Lifetime Supervised Release. (J.S.)

The client had a prior conviction related to Child pornography and was sentenced to Federal Supervised Release for life. The Defense investigation showed that the Defendant had complied with all conditions, and he posed no threat to society. A Motion for Early Termination of Supervised Release was prepared. The defense package, along with advocacy on behalf of the client, was presented to the Government. In a rare move, the Federal prosecutors agreed not to oppose the Defense motion. The Federal District Court granted the Defendant’s Motion, and the Defendant was released from Lifetime Federal Supervised Release.

Related

ASSAULT -FAMILY MEMBER

Case Dismissed (M.M.)

The client, a Houston area medical assistant, was accused by her estranged husband of assaulting her in her family home. The defense showed that the complainant had a history of alcohol abuse and violence. The defense demonstrated that the police failed to conduct an adequate investigation of the initial charge, No charges should have ever been accepted.

Related

View all Case Results

ESTABLISHED & RESPECTED IN THE LEGAL COMMUNITY

Super Lawyers 2025

Super Lawyers 10 Years

Martindale Hubbell PREEMINENT Rating 2025

AV Preeminent and Client Champion 2025

Expertise Best DUI Lawyers in Houston 2023

AVVO Top Attorney

AVVO 10.0 Top Criminal Defense Attorney

AVVO Client’s Choice

Harris County Criminal Lawyers Association

National Assotiation Of Criminal Defense Lawyers

Harris County Lawyers Association (HCCLA) President’s Award

Criminal Defense Blog
Latest Posts

What to Do If You Are a Target of a Federal Grand Jury in Texas

August 17, 2026

A federal grand jury target letter is a serious warning. It usually means federal prosecutors believe they have substantial evidence connecting you to a possible crime and that you may become a defendant. A grand jury subpoena can also mean …

Texas White Collar Crime Defense: When Civil Disputes Become Criminal Investigations

August 2, 2026

A missed loan payment, a failed business deal, a soured partnership, or a bitter divorce may start as a civil dispute. In Texas, however, the same facts that support a civil lawsuit can sometimes lead to a criminal investigation.

That …

How Prior State Convictions Affect Federal Sentencing in Texas Cases

July 4, 2026

When a person is charged with a federal crime in Texas, prior criminal history can become one of the most important issues in the case. A prior state conviction may affect the advisory guideline range, the defendant’s criminal history category, …