Understanding Federal Cybercrime Charges and Computer Fraud Defense in Texas
If federal agents have contacted you about a computer case, the investigation has likely been running for some time. These m
Read More
Call 24/7 For A Free Consultation
Federal prosecutors in the Southern District of Texas are charging money mules under wire fraud, money laundering, and conspiracy statutes, even when the defendant had no knowledge of the underlying scheme.
A money mule is someone who transfers illegally obtained funds on behalf of another party. However, many are unwitting participants recruited through romance scams, fake job offers, or business email compromise. Robert J. Fickman Criminal Defense, has represented alleged money mules in Federal Court. Robert Fickman has also handled more than 300 federal cases in the last 40 years.
The FBI defines a money mule as someone who transfers or moves illegally acquired funds on behalf of another person. Recruitment often happens through job postings advertising “payment processor” positions, through online romance relationships, or through business email compromise.
The money mule is often asked to open an account without knowing it will be used for illegal purposes. The money mule is often told that money will be sent to his account and that he will be instructed to forward it to others via wire transfers, cryptocurrency, or prepaid cards. Federal prosecutors categorize mules into three tiers, and the tier determines what your criminal defense attorney will be up against:
The category shapes the charges and the sentencing exposure.
Money mule prosecutions may involve multiple federal statutes stacked together to maximize sentencing leverage:
The federal sentencing guidelines calculate offense levels primarily based on the total amount of money moved through the mule’s accounts. Federal criminal defense lawyer Robert Fickman may challenge the loss calculations that inflate the guidelines range.

The central defense question is whether the defendant knew the funds were illegally obtained. Federal law requires the government to prove “knowing” conduct, but prosecutors do not always need to show the defendant had actual, direct knowledge.
Instead, they can argue you were aware something was probably wrong with the transactions and deliberately avoided looking into it. The distinction between deliberately avoiding the truth and genuinely not knowing is the line between conviction and acquittal for many money mule defendants. In the Federal Court, the terms used are “deliberate ignorance” or “willful blindness” when describing who made a conscious effort not to know what they were involved in.
If the accused truly believed they were helping a romantic partner, processing payments for a legitimate business, or performing a real job, the government may not be able to prove the accused acted knowingly. Robet Fickman works to build the factual record around what the accused actually knew, when they knew it, and what steps they took to verify the transactions were legitimate.
The FBI and Homeland Security Investigations conduct annual money mule sweeps with the DOJ and international partners, and the Eastern and Southern Districts of Texas have participated actively in these operations. Investigations begin with bank suspicious activity reports, then expand through subpoenas for financial records, electronic surveillance, and cooperating co-defendants who agree to testify against others in the network.
Low-level participants are often charged first, before investigators reach the organizers. When possible, Federal Criminal Defense Lawyer Robert Fickman intervenes early to prevent charges or negotiate cooperation agreements that protect the client’s interests.

Money mule charges carry mandatory restitution, potential asset forfeiture, and prison sentences that can reach decades when counts are stacked. Robert J. Fickman has never served as a prosecutor, is licensed in all four Texas federal districts, and has defended more than 300 federal cases. Contact Robert J. Fickman Criminal Defense to discuss your case.
If federal agents have contacted you about a computer case, the investigation has likely been running for some time. These matters often arrive with digital evidence, records, subpoenas, interviews, server logs, account histories, and a theory of unauthorized access already …
Federal securities fraud investigations usually begin quietly, months before anyone hears the word “charges.” In many cases, the first sign is indirect: a business partner mentions being asked questions, an employer starts pulling records, a compliance department begins reviewing trading …
A federal grand jury target letter is a serious warning. It usually means federal prosecutors believe they have substantial evidence connecting you to a possible crime and that you may become a defendant. A grand jury subpoena can also mean …