Defending Against Federal Mail Fraud Charges in Texas White-Collar Cases
Defending against federal mail fraud charges in Texas starts with the elements prosecutors must prove. Under 18 U.S.C. § 13
Read More
Call 24/7 For A Free Consultation
Friends
Harris County Criminal Justice officials have recently announced the coming of some long over-due reforms. They have been more than a little vague on what those reforms will be.
Da Devon Anderson has announced one reform, plans for more diversions; an outcome where low risk offenders are kept out of jail and given a second chance. DA Anderson should be commended for her commitment toward more diversions. This is a tangible reform.
But more diversions from the DA will not solve the primary problems in our criminal justice system. So long as the Harris County judiciary systematically denies PR bonds, there will be no justice in Harris County.
It’s real simple. So long as the judges systematically deny PR bonds, the poor will remain in jail. The poor will continue to be forced to plead guilty to obtain their liberty.
The judges now uniformly say they would grant more PR bonds but they lack a good tool to evaluate risk. This is False. The risk assessment tool already in place is more than adequate to make an informed decision on whether to grant a PR bond.
The claimed lack of an adequate Risk Assessment tool is smoke utilized by the judiciary in an attempt to justify their unjustifiable denial of PR BONDS.
When a person makes a surety bond, there is no risk assessment. If a person can afford to hire a bondsman they can be charged with murder and walk right out of jail. But a poor person who cannot afford a bond who is charged with trespass stays in jail because the judges falsely claim they can’t adequately access his risk of coming back to court. The judiciary speaks with a giant forked tongue.
In Harris County, If you have money and can hire a bondsman, you don’t need a risk assessment. It’s of no concern. But if you are poor and in the county’s clutches, you will stay in jail because the judges claim they can’t make a risk assessment.
The truth is, the judiciary can make the risk assessment. Risk assessment is simply the latest lame judicial excuse, in a long line of lame judicial excuses, utilized to justify the systematic denial of PR bonds.
The judges systematic denial of PR BONDS is not caused by an inadequate Risk Assessment tool. The judiciary’s systematic denial of PR BONDS is driven by the judiciary’s shared desire to perpetuate the County’s evil Plea Mill. This is most evident in the County courts.
This double standard, this blatant denial of Equal Protection is precisely what will get Harris County sued in Federal Court. So long As the judiciary continues to systematically deny PR bonds, there will be no justice in Harris County.
The county officials talk of reform and pat themselves on the back. They should not pat themselves on the back so hard as to knock themselves down. In fact they should not pat themselves on the back at all. The county has perpetuated the systematic abuse of the poor and minorities for decades. The county should not now engage in self praise for making minor adjustments to an otherwise abusive system that they continue to daily perpetuate.
Robb Fickman, Houston
Defending against federal mail fraud charges in Texas starts with the elements prosecutors must prove. Under 18 U.S.C. § 1341, the government generally must establish a scheme to defraud or obtain money or property through materially false or fraudulent pretenses, …
Federal structuring charges can arise when someone breaks up cash deposits, withdrawals, purchases, or other transactions to avoid a federal reporting requirement. Banks generally must file a Currency Transaction Report when currency transactions by or on behalf of the same …
No federal crime is formally called “PPP fraud.” Prosecutors usually charge Paycheck Protection Program loan allegations under existing federal offenses such as wire fraud, bank fraud, false statements, money laundering, conspiracy, and sometimes aggravated identity theft. Each charge has its …